Thursday, June 19, 2008
Monday, June 16, 2008
Also...
GRADES
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Friday, June 6, 2008
Barking Abbey Pen Pals :)
http://babbeyhth.blogspot.com/
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
America on Trial Rubric continued...
| Sorry, it didn't show the whole rubric in one screen! Good luck tomorrow! :) 4 | 
| Student   presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can   follow. | 
| Student   demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class   questions with explanations and elaboration. Four very strong arguments were   made. | 
| Student   maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. | 
| Student   uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all   audience members can hear presentation. | 
| Student   had strong evidence to support every argument. | 
| Student   had very well developed counterarguments, and answered all questions showing   thorough knowledge of the subject. | 
| Works   very well with others.  Assumes a clear role in decision making and   responsibilities. | 
| Total Points: | 
|      F=  0-18 | 
America on Trial Rubric
America on Trial Rubric
| Presentation Rubric | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Total | |
| Organization | Audience   cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. | Audience   has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. | Student   presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. | Student   presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can   follow. | |
| Subject Knowledge (4 strong arguments must be made) | Student   does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about   subject. Only one vague argument was made. | Student   is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary   questions, but fails to elaborate. Two or three not very strong arguments   were made. | Student   is at ease and answers most questions with explanations and some   elaboration. Three or more relatively strong arguments were made. | Student   demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class   questions with explanations and elaboration. Four very strong arguments were   made. | |
| Eye Contact | Student   makes no eye contact and only reads from notes. | Student   occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads mostly from notes. | Student   maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. | Student   maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. | |
| Verbal Techniques | Student   mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for audience to   hear. | Student's   voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have   difficulty hearing presentation. | Student's   voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience   members can hear presentation. | Student   uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all   audience members can hear presentation. | |
| Strength of Evidence | Student   had very little or no evidence to support their evidence. | Student   made effort to support with adequate evidence. | Student   used evidence to support every argument. | Student   had strong evidence to support every argument. | |
| Q/A   | Was   not able to field questions. | Made   an attempt to answer questions, but answered questions weakly. Did not have   developed counterarguments. | Student   had developed counterarguments and answered questions adequately. | Student   had very well developed counterarguments, and answered all questions showing   thorough knowledge of the subject. | |
| Mechanics (3-5 minutes, no more or less) | Cannot   work with others in most situations.  Cannot share decisions or   responsibilities. | Works   with others, but has difficulty sharing decisions and responsibilities. | Works   well with others.  Takes part in most decisions and shares in the   responsibilities. | Works   very well with others.  Assumes a clear role in decision making and   responsibilities. | |
| Total Points: | |||||
|       A=  26-28 |    B=  24-25 |     C=  21-23 |    D=  19-20 |      F=  0-18 | |
 
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Rockin' in the USA...
What: Rockin' in the USA
Where: TBD
When: June 11/12
Why: Because music rocks, son AND to learn about American history through the lens of the American Musical Tradition.
Pregame:
Choose one of the following music genres that had a significant impact on American history, including modern history:
- jazz
- blues
- musical theatre
- pop music (focus: 50's/60's)
- reggae/ska
- electronic
- country western
- rock
- hip hop/rap
- salsa/latin
Various assignments:
- vocals
- percussionist
- bass
- keys
- guitar
- lyricist
- horns
- strings
Preparation:
Once you have chosen your genre (and group members), you will need to conduct research on how it was significant to our American history, as well as its evolution...not only will you need to discuss its context in our history, but also what the musical characteristics of the genre are (what makes it jazz/blues/etc.)
Presentation:
- Introduction of genre
- historical context
- musical characteristics
- songwriting process (any stories about why the song was written, why you chose the cover you did, the relation between the two, the significance of either song to you or the members of your group, challenges, highlights, etc)
- Perform a cover song in your genre's style
- Perform an original composition in your genre's style
Due date: Tentatively, June 11/12
Blogger Error
The text is all there...you just need to highlight the text that isn't showing, and it will show up.
Good luck! :)
Elika
Trial Requirements
What: America on Trial
Where: Our very own Model United Nations Conference Room
When: Wednesday, June 4th (and tentatively, June 5th, if necessary)
Why: Keep reading below
Length: 3-5 minutes (no more, or less)
Content/Organization: anything you need for this is within your research (historical essay and persuasive outline)
- The introduction is a road map.
- Your introduction should include whether you are defending or indicting America, and WHY - be specific.
- You are going to tell the panel what they will be hearing, in a broader sense, during the rest of your presentation. Look at it as a five paragraph essay with potentially more paragraphs.
- Minimum of four (4) arguments should be in the body of your presentation.
- You only want to use your strongest arguments. Using a weak argument will only open the door for potential questions about your case.
- If you can find a strong hook (not cheesy or forced) to start your arguments, your case will be better remembered, and your arguments will stand out more.  Remember, there are 24(ish) other arguments the panel has to hear.  Why would they remember yours?? Being clear and concise, and potentially having a strong hook is KEY.
- The body of the presentation should give evidentiary and in depth arguments as to why you are indicting or defending America. Rely on your critical thinking skills to develop these arguments. You want to delve deeply into each of the arguments presented in the introduction.
- The conclusion should wrap up the presentation.  Therefore, reiterate your strongest points, and why you are indicting/defending America.
- Pretty much:  First , "We tell 'em what we're gonna tell 'em; Second, "We tell 'em;"  Finally, "We tell 'em what we told 'em."
- After you plead your case, be prepared to answer questions:
- clarifying questions
- evidentiary questions
- suppositional (hypothetical) questions
- etc. (any other challenging questions)
- Keep in mind your weakest arguments, and challenges that could be made to your position.
- Be prepared to hear the counter arguments.
- Predict what may be asked/argued against you.
 

